Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
export class InceptionResult { private readonly _serder: Serder private readonly _sigs: string[] private readonly promise: Promise<Response> constructor(serder: Serder, sigs: string[], promise: Promise<Response>) { this._serder = serder this._sigs = sigs this.promise = promise } get serder() { return this._serder } get sigs() { return this._sigs } async op(): Promise<any> { let res = await this.promise return await res.json() } }Now callers that don't need anything other than the HTTP op can just call `await res.op()` and if you need the serder and sigs, they are available as getters. Does this look "Ok"? If so, I'll be making similar changes to `rotate` and `interact`.
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
Number of replies: 0
async function test1(): Promise<[string, string]> { return ["hello", "world"]; }Destructing itlet [a, b] = await test1();I agree with rodolfo that you should await the Response "earlier", check status and handle any error, and only if things are positive return a promise with all results. Otherwise the caller will see partial results. The create method could then look like thisasync function create(): Promise<[Serder, string[], object]> { ... return [serder, sigs, await res.json]; }
Number of replies: 0